Action Taken Report in respect of Minutes of 1826th meeting held on 31.07.2025.

1. Action Taken Report in respect of Minutes of the 1826th meeting held on 31.07.2025 were discussed.

1. The North-DMC forwarded (online) the proposal for consideration by the Commission.
2. The Commission accepted the concept of the building plans proposal at its meetings on July 3, 2025; specific observations were provided.
3. The building plans proposal for a residential building (B+G+2 floors) received (online) at the formal stage was scrutinised, and the following observations are to be complied with:

a) All parking provisions shall adhere to all the applicable norms/guidelines/regulations, etc.

b) The installation of clear-story solar panels on a well-designed structural frame, integrated with the building design, is suggested to ensure the effective utilisation of the space beneath. This placement also facilitates easy maintenance, reduces heat load through increased shading, and most importantly, improves aesthetics.

c) The Sustainability features shall be as per point 7 of the CPAA (Criterion for Project Assessment and Approval), as available on the DUAC website at www.duac.org.in.

d) All plumbing pipes, rainwater pipes, service equipment, DG Set, DG exhaust pipes, water tanks, air-conditioning units, solar panels, etc., should be camouflaged appropriately (in terms of points nos. 10, 11, and 12 of the CPAA (Criterion for Project Assessment and Approval)), as available on the DUAC website at www.duac.org.in.

1. The South-DMC forwarded (online) the proposal for consideration by the Commission.
2. The Commission accepted the concept of the building plans proposal at its meetings on April 24, 2025; specific observations were provided.
3. The building plans proposal for residential group housing (comprising of Tower A-(G+19 floors), Tower-B (G+20 floors), Community (G+1), EWS (G+4 floors) with a combined basement of three (03) levels)), received (online) at the formal stage was scrutinised along with the previous observations of the Commission communicated vide DUAC conceptual acceptance observation letter no: OL-15042527023 dated 29.04.2025. Based on the previous observations, submission made, and the following observations are to be complied with:

a) The design proposal incorporates provisions for double-stack parking arrangements to meet the necessary parking requirements. Nevertheless, the architect and proponent must ensure the proper implementation of these arrangements on-site, which will be examined during the proposal's completion stage. All parking arrangements adhere to the relevant rules, regulations, guidelines, and other applicable requirements.

b) The installation of clear-story solar panels on a well-designed structural frame, integrated with the building design, is suggested to ensure the effective utilisation of the space beneath. This placement also facilitates easy maintenance, reduces heat load through increased shading, and most importantly, improves aesthetics.

c) The Work of public art of suitable scale, size and material, imparting character and identity to the complex shall ensure to be installed in terms of point nos. 14 of the CPAA (Criterion for Project Assessment and Approval) available on the DUAC website at www.duac.org.in.

d) The Sustainability features shall be as per point 7 of the CPAA (Criterion for Project Assessment and Approval), as available on the DUAC website at www.duac.org.in.

e) All plumbing pipes, rainwater pipes, service equipment, DG Set, DG exhaust pipes, water tanks, air-conditioning units, solar panels, etc., should be camouflaged appropriately (in terms of points nos. 10, 11, and 12 of the CPAA (Criterion for Project Assessment and Approval)), as available on the DUAC website at www.duac.org.in.

1. The South-DMC forwarded (online) the proposal for consideration by the Commission.
2. The Commission accepted the proposal for the building plans concept during its meeting on February 12, 2020. It approved the layout and building plans proposal during the meeting on March 11, 2020, with specific observations. It did not approve the revised building plans at its December 14, 2023, meeting. The Commission approved the revised building plans proposal at the February 8, 2024, meeting, and specific observations were given.
3. The proposal for NOC for completion received (online) at the completion stage was scrutinised along with the submission made at the formal stage.  Based on the submission made, including drawings, photographs, etc, the following observations are to be complied with:

a) The proposal's documentation is incomplete, as site photographs of the terrace, gate, boundary wall, landscaping, artwork, and Swachh Bharat toilet are missing, rendering the submission incomplete at the completion stage. It is necessary to provide an appropriate number of photographs showing the completed superstructure for which the NOC for completion is required. These photographs should be labelled appropriately and delineated, providing uncut and clear views from all sides to depict the work executed at the site accurately.

b) Furthermore, the submitted site photographs show that construction is still ongoing. Works, including the installation of railings in certain residential towers and other construction activities, continue in some parts of the complex. It must be ensured that all works, such as the installation of doors, windows, railings, landscaping, roads, terraces, and other pending items, are fully completed before submitting the proposal for Completion.

c) Further, approval received from DUAC (at the formal stage) shall be superimposed on the plans/elevations/sections etc., over the actual built structure on the site, existing & proposed changes done in the design from the approval (by DUAC), to understand the extents of deviations made internally as well as external changes made with respect to the sanctioned plan, if any.

d) For a better understanding of the proposal side by side photographs ‘Before (submitted 3d views at the time of DUAC formal approval) and After (current actual built construction)’ of the constructed building blocks to be provided.

4. Overall, an incomplete submission supported by incomplete documentation has been received at the Completion stage for the consideration of the Commission. The architect is advised to adhere to all the above observations provided by the Commission and furnish a point-wise incorporation & reply.

1. The North-DMC forwarded (online) the proposal for consideration by the Commission.
2. The Commission approved the building plan proposal at its formal stage during its meeting held on November 22, 2017, and approved the revised building plan proposal (for 2 Basement + stilt + Ground + 5 floors) during its meeting on March 21, 2018, specific observations were given.
3. The Commission did not accept the concept of the revised building plan proposal at its meeting held on November 03, 2022, and on December 29, 2022, specific observations were given. Subsequently, the revised proposal was approved (formal stage) in the Commission meeting held on February 02, 2023, with observations.
4. The Commission did not approve the revised building plans proposal at its meeting held on July 17, 2025; specific observations were given.
5. The revised building plan proposal (with two basements + G+6 floors, including changes to the internal and external design), received (online) at the formal stage, was scrutinised, along with the observations of the Commission communicated vide DUAC letter no: OL-30012323004 No. 23(4)/2023-DUAC dated 23-07-2025, the following observations are to be complied with:

a) The design proposal incorporates provisions for double-stack parking arrangements to meet the necessary parking requirements. Nevertheless, the architect and proponent must ensure the proper implementation of these arrangements on-site, which will be examined during the proposal's completion stage. All parking arrangements adhere to the relevant rules, regulations, guidelines, and other applicable requirements.

b) The installation of clear-story solar panels on a well-designed structural frame, integrated with the building design, is suggested to ensure the effective utilisation of the space beneath.  This placement also facilitates easy maintenance, reduces heat load through increased shading, and most importantly, improves aesthetics.

c) The Sustainability features shall be as per point 7 of the CPAA (Criterion for Project Assessment and Approval), as available on the DUAC website at www.duac.org.in.

d) The Work of public art of suitable scale, size and material, imparting character and identity to the complex shall ensure to be installed in terms of point nos. 14 of the CPAA (Criterion for Project Assessment and Approval) available on the DUAC website at www.duac.org.in.

e) All plumbing pipes, rainwater pipes, service equipment, DG Set, DG exhaust pipes, water tanks, air-conditioning units, solar panels, etc., should be camouflaged appropriately (in terms of points nos. 10, 11, and 12 of the CPAA (Criterion for Project Assessment and Approval)), as available on the DUAC website at www.duac.org.in.

1. The CPWD forwarded the proposal (online) for consideration by the Commission.
2. The Commission did not approve the building plans proposal at its meeting held on July 17, 2025; specific observations were given.
3. The building plans proposal (B+G+3 floors with a height of 14.85m) received (online) at the formal stage was scrutinised, along with the observations of the Commission communicated vide DUAC letter no: OL-10072562028 dated 23-07-2025. Based on the compliances and the submission made, the following observations are to be complied with:

a) It is recommended to use a dark colour for the fascia of the horizontal band below the chajja over the windows, to prevent it from appearing stained due to rainwater trail marks.

b) The installation of clear-story solar panels on a well-designed structural frame, integrated with the building design, is suggested to ensure the effective utilisation of the space beneath. This placement also facilitates easy maintenance, reduces heat load through increased shading, and most importantly, improves aesthetics.

c) The Sustainability features shall be as per point 7 of the CPAA (Criterion for Project Assessment and Approval), as available on the DUAC website at www.duac.org.in.

d) The Work of public art of suitable scale, size and material, imparting character and identity to the complex shall ensure to be installed in terms of point nos. 14 of the CPAA (Criterion for Project Assessment and Approval) available on the DUAC website at www.duac.org.in.

e) All plumbing pipes, rainwater pipes, service equipment, DG Set, DG exhaust pipes, water tanks, air-conditioning units, solar panels, etc., should be camouflaged appropriately (in terms of points nos. 10, 11, and 12 of the CPAA (Criterion for Project Assessment and Approval)), as available on the DUAC website at www.duac.org.in.

Building plans proposal (Demolition & Reconstruction) in respect of New Girls Hostel Building (Bldg. No. 50 B) at IIT Delhi Campus, Hauz Khas. (Conceptual stage)

1. The proposal was forwarded directly by the Architect (online) for consideration by the Commission.
2. The Commission approved the layout plan at its meeting held on September 02, 2015.
3. The building plans proposal for demolition and reconstruction (New Girls Hostel building no. 50B, comprising a basement + G+12 floors) received (online) at the conceptual stage was scrutinised, and a presentation was made by the architect, who provided clarifications to the queries of the Commission. Based on the submission, the discussion held, and the presentation made, the following observations are to be complied with:

a) Incomplete documentation has been submitted, i.e. only one elevation of the building block has been submitted. Also, a 3d aerial view is missing in the current submission. It shall be ensured that complete documentation is submitted at the conceptual stage so that the Commission can review the proposal.

b) The Commission observed that the current proposal is part of a large campus with several existing structures. An area near the proposed site, identified in the IIT Delhi Campus Master Plan as a ‘double basement with two-stack parking,’ has been earmarked for a Multi-Level Car Park (MLCP) to cater to the parking requirements of the ‘Type-C Residences, the New Girls Hostel Building (Bldg. No. 50B), and Hostel F (Boys Hostel) (Bldg. No. 89A)’. However, no specific proposal for the MLCP has been submitted. The repeated submission of new development plans, following the demolition of existing campus buildings, without adequate parking provisions in basements or MLCPs, risks turning the campus into a surface parking area, thereby reducing green spaces. Such changes could lead to environmental concerns, including an increase in paved surfaces that aggravate urban flooding and place additional strain on city infrastructure.

c) The issue was discussed with the project proponent and architect to evaluate possible future developments on the campus. The Commission needs a detailed area statement in a tabular form, showing the allowed and proposed ground coverage and the FAR for both current and future projects. This data will help assess how parking needs for both existing and upcoming projects can be met within the MLCP, helping to preserve surface green spaces and improve groundwater recharge.

d) Additionally, the proponent must submit a letter of undertaking confirming that parking needs for future buildings shall be met through basement parking, multi-level car parking (MLCP), or stilt parking, to prevent the expansion of surface parking, minimise hard-paved areas, and maintain the city’s green cover. All parking provisions must comply with all relevant norms, guidelines, and regulations.

e) To aid the process, the architect confirms to prepare a comprehensive MLCP design, in coordination with the proponent and get it approved from the Commission.

f) The proposed 3D views are presented in isolation; they do not depict the surrounding environment. It should be ensured that the submitted 3D views are integrated into the site surroundings, clearly showing details such as the architectural character of adjacent buildings, street layout, site access, building heights, and their influence on light and ventilation.

g) The current submission specifies texture paint as the façade material. However, to ensure durability and maintain the aesthetic quality of the building, the Commission recommends the use of stone or tiles on the lower floors.

h) It is suggested that the MLCP parking (as mentioned by the architect in the presentation made to the Commission) be designed in such manner that it demonstrates highest standards of design, technology and innovation such as provision of sustainable elements on facades, terrace etc. These low-cost screening mechanisms set precedence for future projects in the city.

i) The architect is also required to submit the design and detailed drawings of the MLCP along with the submission of the hostel block, to facilitate the Commission’s review and approval process and to ensure complete documentation.

j) The submitted drawings show a kitchen facility within the building blocks. A detailed plan should be submitted, indicating the kitchen servicing layout, including chimney exhaust and a solid waste management plan to ensure effective disposal of both dry and wet waste.

k) The installation of clear-story solar panels on a well-designed structural frame, integrated with the building design, is suggested to ensure the effective utilisation of the space beneath. This placement also facilitates easy maintenance, reduces heat load through increased shading, and most importantly, improves aesthetics.

l) The Sustainability features shall be as per point 7 of the CPAA (Criterion for Project Assessment and Approval), as available on the DUAC website at www.duac.org.in.

m) The Work of public art of suitable scale, size and material, imparting character and identity to the complex shall ensure to be installed in terms of point nos. 14 of the CPAA (Criterion for Project Assessment and Approval) available on the DUAC website at www.duac.org.in.

n) All plumbing pipes, rainwater pipes, service equipment, DG Set, DG exhaust pipes, water tanks, air-conditioning units, solar panels, etc., should be camouflaged appropriately (in terms of points nos. 10, 11, and 12 of the CPAA (Criterion for Project Assessment and Approval)), as available on the DUAC website at www.duac.org.in.

4. Overall, the proposal received at the conceptual stage is incomplete and needs improvement. The architect is advised to adhere to all the above observations and provide a point-by-point incorporation and response.

Building plans proposal (Demolition & Reconstruction) in respect of Hostel F (Boys Hostel) (Bldg. No. 89A) at IIT Delhi Campus, Hauz Khas (Conceptual stage)

1. The proposal was forwarded directly by the Architect (online) for consideration by the Commission.
2. The Commission approved the layout plan proposal at its meeting held on September 02, 2015.
3. The building plans proposal for demolition and reconstruction (Hostel-F (Boys Hostel building no. 89A comprising of a basement + G+ 12 floors) received (online) at the conceptual stage was scrutinised, and an offline presentation was made by the architect, who provided clarifications to the queries of the Commission. Based on the submission, the discussion held, and the presentation made, the following observations are to be complied with:

a) Incomplete documentation has been submitted, i.e. only one elevation of the building block has been submitted. Also, a 3d aerial view is missing in the current submission. It shall be ensured to submit complete documentation required at the conceptual stage so as the proposal is reviewed by the Commission.

b) The Commission observed that the current proposal is part of a large campus with several existing structures. An area near the proposed site, identified in the IIT Delhi Campus Master Plan as a ‘double basement with two-stack parking,’ has been earmarked for a Multi-Level Car Park (MLCP) to cater to the parking requirements of the ‘Type-C Residences, the New Girls Hostel Building (Bldg. No. 50B), and Hostel F (Boys Hostel) (Bldg. No. 89A)’. However, no specific proposal for the MLCP has been submitted. The repeated submission of new development plans, following the demolition of existing campus buildings, without adequate parking provisions in basements or MLCPs, risks turning the campus into a surface parking area, thereby reducing green spaces. Such changes could lead to environmental concerns, including an increase in paved surfaces that aggravate urban flooding and place additional strain on city infrastructure.

c) The issue was discussed with the project proponent and architect to evaluate possible future developments on the campus. The Commission needs a detailed area statement in a table, showing the allowed and proposed ground coverage and the FAR for both current and future projects. This data will help assess how parking needs for both existing and upcoming projects can be met within the MLCP, helping to preserve surface green spaces and improve groundwater recharge.

d) Additionally, the proponent must submit a letter of undertaking confirming that parking needs for future buildings shall be met through basement parking, multi-level car parking (MLCP), or stilt parking, to prevent the expansion of surface parking, minimise hard-paved areas, and maintain the city’s green cover. All parking provisions must comply with all relevant norms, guidelines, and regulations.

e) To aid the process, the architect confirms to prepare a comprehensive MLCP design, in coordination with the proponent and get it approved from the Commission.

f) The proposed 3D views are presented in isolation; they do not depict the surrounding environment. It should be ensured that the submitted 3D views are integrated into the site surroundings, clearly showing details such as the architectural character of adjacent buildings, street layout, site access, building heights, and their influence on light and ventilation.

g) Site photographs of the surrounding buildings to be provided in the submission to explain the character of the buildings in the complex and their impact on the proposed development.

h) The current submission specifies texture paint as the façade material. However, to ensure durability and maintain the aesthetic quality of the building, the Commission strongly recommends the use of stone or tiles on the lower floors.

i) It is suggested that the MLCP parking (as mentioned by the architect in the presentation made to the Commission) be designed in such manner that it demonstrates highest standards of design, technology and innovation such as provision of sustainable elements on facades, terrace etc. These low-cost screening mechanisms set precedence for future projects in the city.

j) The architect is also required to submit the design and detailed drawings of the MLCP, along with the submission of the hostel block, to facilitate the Commission’s review and approval process and to ensure complete documentation.

k) It is suggested to enhance the corridor railing design to improve aesthetics while ensuring user safety. The RCC parapet may be retained, with an appropriate railing design incorporated to achieve the desired visual quality.

l) A lot of waste (dry and wet, food items, etc.) is supposed to be generated in the hostel; a detailed solid waste management plan proposal, along with its location on the site plan, should be submitted.

m) A signage policy should be adopted on the site to maintain uniformity. They need to be appropriately located to ensure that they do not mar the aesthetics of the façade.

n) The installation of clear-story solar panels on a well-designed structural frame, integrated with the building design, is suggested to ensure the effective utilisation of the space beneath. This placement also facilitates easy maintenance, reduces heat load through increased shading, and most importantly, improves aesthetics.

o) The Sustainability features shall be as per point 7 of the CPAA (Criterion for Project Assessment and Approval), as available on the DUAC website at www.duac.org.in.

p) The Work of public art of suitable scale, size and material, imparting character and identity to the complex shall ensure to be installed in terms of point nos. 14 of the CPAA (Criterion for Project Assessment and Approval) available on the DUAC website at www.duac.org.in.

q) All plumbing pipes, rainwater pipes, service equipment, DG Set, DG exhaust pipes, water tanks, air-conditioning units, solar panels, etc., should be camouflaged appropriately (in terms of points nos. 10, 11, and 12 of the CPAA (Criterion for Project Assessment and Approval)), as available on the DUAC website at www.duac.org.in.

4. Overall, the proposal received at the conceptual stage is incomplete and needs improvement. The architect is advised to adhere to all the above observations and provide a point-by-point incorporation and response.